Skip to main content
Home
We Can Stop Project 2025
Learn. Share. Take Action: Vote.

After looking at it, the general has given it very little thought as many of the policy proposals are unserious in nature – at best. Privatizing NOAA is not something that the Congressman is in support of nor will he ever be.

James Hogge, communications director for Congressman Jack Bergman
Project 2025 proposals could impact NOAA scientific climate change studies - The Alpena News

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Contents
  • Recent Press
  • Random Excerpts
  • Search
  • Bulletins

Page 75

See this page in the PDF

Central Personnel Agencies: Managing the Bureaucracy

Making the Appeals Process Work. The nonmilitary government dismissal rate is well below 1 percent, and no private-sector industry employee enjoys the job security that a federal employee enjoys. Both safety and justice demand that managers learn to act strategically to hire good and fire poor performers legally. The initial paperwork required to separate poor or abusive performers (when they are infrequently identified) is not overwhelming, and managers might be motivated to act ifit were not for the appeals and enforcement processes. Formal appeal in the private sector is mostly a rather simple two-step process, but government unions and associations have been able to convince politicians to support a multiple and extensive appeals and enforcement process.
As noted, there are multiple administrative appeals bodies. The FLRA, OSC, and EEOC have relatively narrow jurisdictions. Claims that an employee’s removal or disciplinary actions violate the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between an agency and a union are handled by the FLRA, employees who claim their removal was the result of discrimination can appeal to the EEOC, and employees who believe their firing was retribution for being a whistleblower can go to the OSC. While the MSPB specializes in abuses of direct merit system issues, it can and does hear and review almost any of the matters heard by the other agencies.
Cases involving race, gender, religion, age, pregnancy, disability, or national origin can be appealed to the EEOC or the MSPB—and in some cases to both—and to the OSC. This gives employees multiple opportunities to prove their cases, and while the EEOC, MSPB, FLRA, and OSC may all apply essentially the same burden of proof, the odds of success may be substantially different in each forum. In fact, forum shopping among them for a friendlier venue is acommon practice, but frequent filers face no consequences for frivolous complaints. As aresult, meritorious cases are frequently delayed, denying relief and justice to truly aggrieved individuals.
The MSPB can and does handle all such matters, but it faces a backlog of an estimated 3,000 cases of people who were potentially wrongfully terminated or disciplined as far back as 2013. From 2017-2022 the MSPB lacked the quorum required to decide appeals. On the other hand, as of January 2023, the EEOC had a backlog of 42,000 cases.
While federal employees win appeals relatively infrequently—MSPB administrative judges have upheld agency decisions as much as 80 percent of the time—the real problem is the time and paperwork involved in the elaborate process that managers must undergo during appeals. This keeps even the best managers from bringing cases in all but the most egregious cases of poor performance or misconduct. As a result, the MSPB, EEOC, FLRA, and OSC likely see very few cases compared to the number of occurrences, and nonperformers continue to be paid and often are placed in nonwork positions.
Having a choice of appeals is especially unique to the government. If lower-priority issues were addressed in-house, serious adverse actions would be less subject

Take Action

Vote. Share. Get involved.

Project 2025 - Top Issues

Read Project 2025 on top issues:

Medicare, education, health care, climate change, veterans, energy, birth control, Social Security, overtime, agriculture, mifepristone, Israel, small business, school lunches, disabilities, Supreme Court, abortion, the death penalty, porn, immigration

Dive Deeper

Read the Project 2025 Comics

Comics explaining Project 2025 (https://stopproject2025comic.org/): 

"Project 2025 is a detailed plan to shut you up, and shut you out.

Don’t let it do either.

Read on, then vote."

Comics explain Project 2025 by topic: Children. Health care. Voting. Taxes. Climate. Education. And more.

Read Project 2025 in an open, online discussion

Read and discuss Project 2025 - the whole thing

Joyce Vance Columns on Project 2025

Law professor and NBC Legal Analyst Joyce Vance covers Project 2025

Some Recent Press

more

Bulletins

  • Project 2025 and Head Start
  • Project 2025: Eliminate, Eliminate, Eliminate
  • Project 2025 - Impact on Veterans
  • Project 2025 and New Mexico
  • Project 2025 - Impact on Medicare
more

Subscribe

Copyright © 2026