It’s preposterous. There’s no problem that’s getting addressed with this solution, this is a solution in search of some problem.
See this page in the PDF
The Case for Fair Trade
• The dogma of the Ricardian free-trade model, which has been used as propaganda to thwart the adoption of measures that seek to level the global trading field for American manufacturers, farmers, ranchers, and workers;
• The politics of trade policy, which has led to a great divide that makes trade policy reforms difficult to implement;
• The economics of trade deficits, which are not adequately understood either by the American public or by the policymaking intelligentsia; and
• §=The crucial role of supportive White House and Administration personnel in implementing effective trade policies.
The Dogma of Free Trade. Clearly, the fair and balanced trade orientation of this chapter runs starkly against the free trade grain of the globalist Ricardian orthodoxy, which is predicated on the theory that free trade represents the best path by which to achieve both American and global prosperity. This orthodoxy is based on the ivory tower academic conclusion that if countries trade freely among each other, each will pursue its own comparative advantages; production will be most efficient around the world; the economic pie will be bigger both for the globe and for each free trading country; and (so long as workers who lose their jobs are fairly compensated from the gains from trade) everyone will be better off.
The most obvious problem with this orthodoxy (there are many more) is that nowhere is Ricardian free trade mirrored in the real world. Instead, America trades in a world where the WTO’s MFN rules are stacked against us, scofflaws like Communist China run roughshod over what meager WTO rules there are, and the United States among all of the world’s developed nations is the biggest victim of the free trade Ricardian orthodoxy.
During his first term, President Donald Trump preached that there can be no free trade without fair, reciprocal, and balanced trade. He was right then, and whoever is the next President in 2025 should heed this critical principle whenever the flag of free trade is waved to prevent the adoption of needed reforms.
The Politics of Trade Policy: Who Benefits? Today, there is a great divide among Americans that stands in the way of constructive trade policy reforms. This great divide is certainly not about a partisan desire for low taxes and a reduced regulatory burden. Rather, it is over whether our borders should be open or secure and whether it is prudent to offshore our manufacturing and defense industrial base and associated supply chains.
Those who support secure borders and seek to onshore more of American production and supply chains do so to boost the real wages of American workers and to
Take Action
Project 2025 - Top Issues
Read Project 2025 on top issues:
Medicare, education, health care, climate change, veterans, energy, birth control, Social Security, overtime, agriculture, mifepristone, Israel, small business, school lunches, disabilities, Supreme Court, abortion, the death penalty, porn, immigration
Dive Deeper
Read the Project 2025 Comics
Comics explaining Project 2025 (https://stopproject2025comic.org/):
"Project 2025 is a detailed plan to shut you up, and shut you out.
Don’t let it do either.
Read on, then vote."
Comics explain Project 2025 by topic: Children. Health care. Voting. Taxes. Climate. Education. And more.
Read Project 2025 in an open, online discussion
Read and discuss Project 2025 - the whole thing
Joyce Vance Columns on Project 2025
Law professor and NBC Legal Analyst Joyce Vance covers Project 2025