Skip to main content
Home
We Can Stop Project 2025
Learn. Share. Take Action: Vote.

Project 2025's proposed attacks on the VA are a betrayal of the sacred promise this country makes to veterans.

Chris Deluzio , veteran, Congressman, Pennsylvania D-17, Member of House Veterans' Affairs Committee
Republican Project 2025 Takes Dead Aim at Veterans' Health and Disability Benefits

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Contents
  • Recent Press
  • Random Excerpts
  • Search
  • Bulletins

Page 839

See this page in the PDF

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

On February 27, 2023, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari.” The Court should issue its final decision by 2024.
The CFPBis a highly politicized, damaging, and utterly unaccountable federal agency. It is unconstitutional. Congress should abolish the CFPB and reverse Dodd-Frank Section 1061, thus returning the consumer protection function of the CFPB to banking regulators®™ and the Federal Trade Commission. Provided the Supreme Court affirms the Fifth Circuit holding in Community Financial Services Association of America, the next conservative President should order the immediate dissolution of the agency—pull down its prior rules, regulations and guidance, return its staff to their prior agencies and its building to the General Services Administration.
Until this can be accomplished, however, Congress should:
• Ensure that any civil penalty funds not used to recompense wronged consumers go to the Department of the Treasury. The funds should not be retained by the Bureau to be dispensed at the pleasure of the Director— potentially to political actors. Moreover, the CFPB should not have a financial incentive to impose penalties.
• Repeal Dodd-Frank Section 1071. This section, which relates to smallbusiness data collection, imposes requirements on financial institutions’ lending to small firms, raises costs, and limits small businesses’ access to capital.**
• Require that no CFPB funds are spent on enforcement actions that are not based on a rulemaking that complies with the Administrative Procedure Act.”
• Require that respondents in administrative actions be allowed to elect whether an adjudication occurs in an administrative law court
or an ordinary Article III federal court.*°
• ©6Specify the nature of “deceptive, unfair, and abusive” practices to define the scope of the CFPB mission more precisely.

Take Action

Vote. Share. Get involved.

Project 2025 - Top Issues

Read Project 2025 on top issues:

Medicare, education, health care, climate change, veterans, energy, birth control, Social Security, overtime, agriculture, mifepristone, Israel, small business, school lunches, disabilities, Supreme Court, abortion, the death penalty, porn, immigration

Dive Deeper

Read the Project 2025 Comics

Comics explaining Project 2025 (https://stopproject2025comic.org/): 

"Project 2025 is a detailed plan to shut you up, and shut you out.

Don’t let it do either.

Read on, then vote."

Comics explain Project 2025 by topic: Children. Health care. Voting. Taxes. Climate. Education. And more.

Read Project 2025 in an open, online discussion

Read and discuss Project 2025 - the whole thing

Joyce Vance Columns on Project 2025

Law professor and NBC Legal Analyst Joyce Vance covers Project 2025

Some Recent Press

more

Bulletins

  • Project 2025 and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
  • Project 2025 - Impact on Agriculture
  • Project 2025 and South Carolina
  • Project 2025 and New Mexico
  • Project 2025's Most Used Words
more

Subscribe

Copyright © 2026